Huge fecaloma in a rectum ampulla resolved with conservative treatment using a carbonated soft drink.

Colonic impaction due to a fecaloma is a very frequent complication in patients with chronic constipation. Most cases respond to conservative measures such as digital disimpaction or treatment with oral laxatives and enemas. However, in some cases fecalomas could be refractory to these treatments requiring aggressive measures such as endoscopic or surgical removal. Even more, there are a few cases of death reported as a complication of a fecaloma refractory to usual treatments. We report, for the first time, a case of a patient with a huge fecaloma refractory to oral laxative and enemas resolved conservatively with a single irrigation of a carbonated soft drink through a rectal probe.

Patients' perspective on sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Systematic use of sedation or systematic prior information?

Although sedation in endoscopy is increasingly used and contributes to the quality of procedures, its role in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is not as well defined as in other procedures. For this reason, we conducted a prospective pilot study where the patient, once informed of the different options, decided whether or not to undergo sedation for UGE. Remarkably, almost 60% preferred not to undergo sedation, with a high degree of satisfaction and no adverse effects in any of the groups (Ferrer Rosique JA, et al. XXXIX Congreso SEED, Toledo 2017).

Perspectiva del paciente sobre la sedación en endoscopia alta. ¿Uso sistemático de sedación o la sistemática información previa? / Patients' perspective on sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Systematic use of sedation or systematic prior information?

No disponible

Author´s reply: About human taeniasis and Taenia saginata diagnosis by endoscopy

No disponible

Author´s reply: About human taeniasis and Taenia saginata diagnosis by endoscopy.

Dear editor. We have published an article about the role of the endoscopy in the Taeniosis. I will try to clarify some doubts and misinformation about it, as well Galan-Puchades MT suggests.

La endoscopia como técnica diagnóstica y terapéutica alternativa de la teniasis / Endoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative technique of taeniasis

A pesar de su baja incidencia en países desarrollados, la teniasis gastrointestinal debería sospecharse ante todo paciente con clínica de dolor abdominal, diarrea, anemia y/o malabsorción de origen desconocido, más aún si ha estado en áreas endémicas o con malas condiciones alimentarias-higiénicas. El diagnóstico tradicional es la identificación del parásito en las heces, existiendo además métodos serológicos o inmunológicos más recientes. Se revisa a raíz de un caso diagnosticado por gastroscopia, los casos reportados en la literatura que han sido diagnosticados por endoscopia y finalmente discutiremos acerca de la endoscopia como método diagnóstico, así como la eficacia y seguridad que proporcionaría el tratamiento endoscópico dado el potencial riesgo de neurocisticercosis (AU)

Despite a low incidence in developed countries, gastrointestinal taeniasis should be suspected in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea, anemia, and/or malabsorption of unknown origin, even more so if they come from endemic regions or areas with poor hygienic and alimentary habits. Diagnosis is traditionally reached by identifying the parasite in stools, but more recently both serological and immunological approaches are also available. Based on a patient diagnosed by gastroscopy, a literature review was undertaken of patients diagnosed by endoscopy. We discuss endoscopy as diagnostic modality, and the effectiveness and safety that endoscopic treatment may provide in view of the potential risk for neurocysticercosis (AU)

Endoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative technique of taeniasis.

Despite a low incidence in developed countries, gastrointestinal taeniasis should be suspected in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea, anemia, and/or malabsorption of unknown origin, even more so if they come from endemic regions or areas with poor hygienic and alimentary habits. Diagnosis is traditionally reached by identifying the parasite in stools, but more recently both serological and immunological approaches are also available. Based on a patient diagnosed by gastroscopy, a literature review was undertaken of patients diagnosed by endoscopy. We discuss endoscopy as diagnostic modality, and the effectiveness and safety that endoscopic treatment may provide in view of the potential risk for neurocysticercosis.

Transoral endoluminal approach to Zenker's diverticulum using Ligasure™. Early clinical experience.

The development of minimally invasive procedures has rekindled interest in endoluminal techniques for the management of Zenker's diverticulum. Tissue sealers as employed in laparoscopic surgery have not been previously used for Zenker's diverticulum septotomy.Supported by the established safety of linear cutters, bipolar forceps, and ultrasonic scalpels, we have started a procedure using the Ligasure 5™ tissue sealer. Safety and efficacy results in our early clinical experience are shown for a prospective series of 5 consecutive Zenker's diverticulum cases that were perorally managed with tissue sealing.The procedure was quickly and safely performed in the endoscopy room under sedation. Mean number of seals per patient was 2, and mean procedure duration was 33 minutes. No complications developed during or after the procedure, and patients were discharged with immediate dysphagia relief and adequate oral tolerance. No diverticular relapses occurred after a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 18-30). This procedure may be repeated as often as desired with no need for hospital admission. Safety should be prospectively assessed by further studies using a higher number of procedures.

Tratamiento endoluminal transoral del divertículo de Zenker con LigasureTM. Experiencia clínica inicial / Transoral endoluminal approach to Zenker's diverticulum using LigasureTM. Early clinical experience

El desarrollo de los procedimientos mínimamente invasivos ha reavivado el interés por las técnicas endoluminales para el tratamiento del divertículo de Zenker. Los selladores titulares empleados en cirugía laparoscópica no han sido empleados previamente en la septotomía del divertículo de Zenker. Avalados por la seguridad previa del empleo de las cortadoras lineales, de las pinzas bipolares y de los bisturís por ultrasonidos, hemos iniciado dicho procedimiento mediante el empleo del sellador tisular Ligasure 5TM. Se muestran los resultados de seguridad y eficacia en la experiencia clínica inicial de una serie prospectiva de 5 casos consecutivos de divertículo de Zenker tratados por vía peroral con el sellador tisular. El procedimiento se realizó en la sala de endoscopia, con sedación, de manera rápida y segura. La media de sellados por paciente fue de 2 y la duración media del procedimiento de 33 minutos. No se presentaron complicaciones durante el procedimiento ni derivadas del mismo, siendo dados de alta los pacientes con desaparición inmediata de la disfagia y correcta tolerancia oral. Con un seguimiento medio de 21 meses (rango 18-30), no existió recidiva del divertículo en ningún caso. Este procedimiento puede ser repetido tantas veces como se desee y ser realizado sin ingreso hospitalario. La seguridad mostrada deberá ser evaluada prospectivamente en estudios posteriores con mayor número de procedimientos (AU)

The development of minimally invasive procedures has rekindled interest in endoluminal techniques for the management of Zenker’s diverticulum. Tissue sealers as employed in laparoscopic surgery have not been previously used for Zenker’s diverticulum septotomy. Supported by the established safety of linear cutters, bipolar forceps, and ultrasonic scalpels, we have started a procedure using the Ligasure 5TM tissue sealer. Safety and efficacy results in our early clinical experience are shown for a prospective series of 5 consecutive Zenker’s diverticulum cases that were perorally managed with tissue sealing. The procedure was quickly and safely performed in the endoscopy room under sedation. Mean number of seals per patient was 2, and mean procedure duration was 33 minutes. No complications developed during or after the procedure, and patients were discharged with immediate dysphagia relief and adequate oral tolerance. No diverticular relapses occurred after a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 18-30). This procedure may be repeated as often as desired with no need for hospital admission. Safety should be prospectively assessed by further studies using a higher number of procedures (AU)